Here, courtesy of Glenn Wallis of the Barking and Gospel Oak Line User Group is an explanation - edited by me - of why it would be difficult if not impossible to have more or longer diesel trains on this line to relieve peak time overcrowding.
Trailer coaches
Just one trailer (ie
unpowered) coach added to each unit would seriously affect the
performance the resulting 2+1 unit and Network Rail might even levy
increased track access charges for the loss of track capacity.
The
Turbostar was designed as an all vehicle powered train, so even
trailers would require a lot of design work and possibly alterations to
the existing power cars as well.
Engine upgrade
There is no diesel engine that meets current EU emissions regulations that can be installed in the Bombardier Turbostar without a costly and difficult redesign which neither Bombardier or Angel Trains are interested in unless there is going to be a big order for the redesigned vehicles.
Leasing costs
TfL do not lease the Overground Turbostars, LOROL do, which complicates matters even more. TfL would have to pay to have the leases transferred to them and then pay vastly increased rental costs to Angel Trains to make it worth their while to pay the high costs of buying 8, or 16 redesigned Turbostar coaches from Bombardier.
Electrification
TfL are now realising that instead of being a 'nice to have', electrification of the B-GO is now becoming essential as the only way to deal with the overcrowding."
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
Gospel Oak and Barking Line train overcrowding
Labels:
angel trains,
barking and gospel oak line,
bgolug,
BGORUG,
class 172,
glenn wallis,
lorol,
tfl,
turbostar
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment